
"We ought to consider what is the end of government, before we determine which is best form. Upon this point all speculative politicians will agree, that the happiness of society is the end of government, as all divines and moral philosophers will agree that the happiness of the individual is the end of man. From this principle it will follow, that the form of government which communicates ease, comfort, to
the greatest number of persons, and in the greatest degree, is the best."All sober inquiries after truth, ancient and modern, pagan and Christian, have declared that the happiness of man, as well as his dignity, consists in virtue. Confucius, Zo- roaster, Socrates, Mahomet, not to mention authorities really sacred, have agreed in this.
"If there is a form of government, then, whose principle and foundation is virtue, will not every sober man acknowledge it better calculated to promote the general happiness than any other form?
"
Fear is the foundation of most government; but it is so sordid and brutal a passion, and renders men in whose breasts it predominates so
stupid and miserable, that Americans will not be likely to approve of any political institution which is founded on it.
"Honor is truly sacred, but hold a lower rank in the scale of moral excellence than virtue. Indeed, the former is but a part of the latter, and consequently has not equal pretensions to support a frame of government productive of human happiness.
"The foundation of every government is some principle or passion in the minds of the people. The noblest principles and most generous affections in our nature, then, have the fairest chance to support the noblest and most generous models of government.
". . . This will teach them the great political virtues of humility, patience, and moderation, without which every man in power becomes
a ravenous beast of prey.
". . .
'Where annual elections end, there slavery begins.'"
Thoughts on Government - by John Adams, 1776After reading this, I felt a bit inspired. Take it in whichever form you will. I find it strikingly appropriate in these times that outright revolt and punishment has become the acceptable reaction of those who find themselves defeated following the execution of the democratic process.
What message is being sent to those persecuted? What is one trying to accomplish? And by what means?
Food for thought...
-Benjamin W. Phillips